Skip to content
  • (205) 326-3336
  • [email protected]
  • Calls Answered 24 Hours
Facebook-f Twitter Linkedin-in
  • Home
  • About
    • Accolades and Awards
    • Careers
    • In the Community
    • Our History
    • Our People
  • Attorneys
  • Practices
    • Automotive Defects
    • Brain And Spinal Injury
    • Business Litigation Intellectual
    • Class Action and Mass Torts
    • Defective Product Injury
    • Medical Device Injury
    • Nursing Home Abuse And Neglect
    • Personal Injury And Wrongful Death
    • Pharmaceutical Drug Injury
    • Sexual Harassment
    • Trucking And Motor Vehicle Collisions
    • Toxic Chemical Exposure
    • More Practice Areas
  • Cases
    • 3M Military Earplugs Lawsuit
    • Camp Lejeune
    • CPAP
    • Juul Vape Devices Case
    • Paragard IUD Lawsuit
    • Paraquat Exposure
    • PFAS
    • Social Media
    • Talcum Powder
    • Zantac
  • News
    • Blog
    • News
    • Video Resources Page
  • Contact
Menu
  • Home
  • About
    • Accolades and Awards
    • Careers
    • In the Community
    • Our History
    • Our People
  • Attorneys
  • Practices
    • Automotive Defects
    • Brain And Spinal Injury
    • Business Litigation Intellectual
    • Class Action and Mass Torts
    • Defective Product Injury
    • Medical Device Injury
    • Nursing Home Abuse And Neglect
    • Personal Injury And Wrongful Death
    • Pharmaceutical Drug Injury
    • Sexual Harassment
    • Trucking And Motor Vehicle Collisions
    • Toxic Chemical Exposure
    • More Practice Areas
  • Cases
    • 3M Military Earplugs Lawsuit
    • Camp Lejeune
    • CPAP
    • Juul Vape Devices Case
    • Paragard IUD Lawsuit
    • Paraquat Exposure
    • PFAS
    • Social Media
    • Talcum Powder
    • Zantac
  • News
    • Blog
    • News
    • Video Resources Page
  • Contact
Search
Close
  • VIEW MENU
    • About
          • Our Mission and Vision

            Welcome to Heninger Garrison Davis law firm. We are so glad you found us. Whether you are experiencing a business dispute or have suffered a life-altering injury, our attorneys are here to help you navigate the legal system from start to finish.

          • Learn More
          • Accolades and Awards

            Many of our attorneys and the firm itself have received numerous accolades over the years.

          • View Details
    • Practice Areas
      • Brain And Spinal Injury
      • Business Litigation And Intellectual Property
      • Class Action and Mass Torts
      • Defective Product Injury
      • Insurance Disputes
      • Medical Device Injury
      • Nursing Home Abuse And Neglect
      • Personal Injury And Wrongful Death
      • Pharmaceutical Drug Injury
      • Sexual Harassment
      • Toxic Chemical Exposure
      • Trucking And Motor Vehicle Collisions
      • More Practice Areas
    • Attorneys
      • Taylor Bartlett
      • François M. Blaudeau, MD
      • William L. Bross
      • Jacqueline Knapp Burt
      • Timothy C. Davis
      • W. Lee Gresham, III
      • Anna M. Carroll
      • Stephen D. Heninger
      • W. Lewis Garrison, Jr.
      • Mark Ekonen
      • Erik S. Heninger
      • Kathryn Harrington
      • Caroline U. Hollingsworth
      • K. Stephen Jackson
      • Jeffrey P. Leonard
      • Honza J. P. Prchal
      • Christopher B. Hood
      • J. Callen Sparrow
      • Brandy L. Robertson
      • Amanda S. Williamson
      • Jeanie S. Sleadd
    • Support Team
    • Cases
      • Talcum Powder
      • 3M Military Earplugs Lawsuit
      • Camp Lejeune
      • CPAP
      • Juul Vape Devices Case
      • Mercedes Burl Walnut Wood Trim
      • Paragard IUD Lawsuit
      • Paraquat Exposure
      • PFAS
      • Social Media
      • Zantac
    • News
      • photo of exterior sign of birmingham law office
      • Practice Areas
      • News
      • BLOG
      • Video Resources Page
    • Referring Attorneys
    • View All
    • Careers
    • Contact Us
          • Alabama

            2224 1st Avenue North Birmingham, AL 35203

            (205) 549-4523

          • Contact Us
          • Alabama Location
          • Georgia

            2727 Paces Ferry Road SE, Suite 750, Atlanta, GA 30339

            (404) 996-0860

          • Contact Us
          • Georgia Location
          • New York

            5 Penn Plaza, 23rd Floor New York, NY 10001

            (800) 241-9779

          • Contact Us
          • New York Location

Behind the Landmark Weeks Case

The plaintiff’s attorneys examine the Alabama Supreme Court’s decision on brand-drugmaker liability

BIRMINGHAM, ALA: In a landmark decision, the Alabama Supreme Court ruled on January 11, 2013, that a patient who alleges injury from a generic prescription drug can sue makers of the brandname drug for failing to warn about the product’s risks. The ruling, which issued in favor of Plaintiff Danny Weeks, comes after courts across the country have rejected a similar theory of liability. In his victory, Weeks was represented by attorneys of Heninger Garrison Davis, LLC, who argued the case before the state high court.

“We now have broad daylight for our claims against the brand-makers of Reglan,” commented Lew Garrison, the HGD senior partner in charge of the case. “It is a great win for Danny and vindicates our decision to sue the brand defendants.” The suit is pending in federal court in Montgomery, Alabama, and has been stayed pending the Alabama Supreme Court’s decision on the question whether a plaintiff allegedly harmed by a generic medicine can sue the brandmaker of the drug. The federal court certified the question to the high court.

Danny Weeks alleges that he developed tardive dyskinesia, a movement disorder, from a generic version of the acid reflux drug Reglan, and that the brand-name manufacturers of the medicine (Wyeth LLC, Pfizer Inc., and Schwarz Pharma, Inc.) failed to adequately warn about its risks. Those brand defendants asked the federal court to certify the question.

In siding with Weeks, the Supreme Court reasoned that “an omission or defect in the labeling for the brand name drug would necessarily be repeated in the generic labeling, foreseeably causing harm to a patient who ingested the generic product.” The court distinguished Weeks’ claims and argument from several prior decisions in favor of brand-makers sued by patients who ingest only the generic versions of a drug. Chris Hood, another of Weeks’ attorneys at HGD, called the decision “compelling and well reasoned.”

“The Alabama Supreme Court is the first and only supreme court of any state to adopt the theory of liability we advocate,” Hood said. “It correctly identified and applied basic tort principles overlooked by numerous lower courts which rejected similar theories,” he added. “The win is tremendously satisfying, particularly because it makes clear that Danny has recourse for his injuries.”

Prior to the win, over 70 courts across the country had sided with brand‑makers in similar cases. Courts in only two states, California and Vermont, have allowed similar claims to proceed. Furthermore, the U.S. Supreme Court decision PLIVA, Inc. v. Mensing, issued in 2011, rejected a plaintiff’s suit against generic drug makers for failing to warn about their products’ risks. That decision is based on federal preemption of state tort law. Commentators agree that it forecloses claims against generic makers for inadequate warnings on drug labels.

“Alabamians injured by generic prescriptions now can hold the brand-maker accountable for understating the risks of the drug,” Chris Hood explained. “It is the right decision, and it stands on settled law of our state.”

Alabama for decades has recognized that a person harmed by someone else’s misrepresentation can sue that person even if the misrepresentation was made to a third party, not to the person actually harmed by it. Weeks’ claims that the brand-makers of Reglan misinformed his prescribing doctor by understating the risk of contracting tardive dyskinesia from the drug. The doctor is owed a duty of truth on the part of the brand-makers, Weeks’ attorneys argued based on the legal rule known as the learned intermediary doctrine.

Lew Garrison, Weeks’ chief attorney, believes the decision may positively influence courts in other states and thereby provide recourse for patients injured by generic replicas of brand drugs. “States which recognize the learned intermediary doctrine and liability for third‑party fraud may follow suit,” he predicts.

 

anniversary logo for birmingham alabama best personal injury law firm
  • (205) 326-3336
  • [email protected]
  • Mon - Fri: 8 AM - 5 PM
  • HGDLAW Careers

Alabama

  • 2224 1st Avenue North
    Birmingham, AL 35203
  • (205) 326-3336

Georgia

  • 2727 Paces Ferry Road SE
    Suite 750
    Atlanta, GA 30339
  • (800) 241-9779

New York

  • 5 Penn Plaza
    23rd Floor
    New York, NY 10001
  • (800) 241-9779

HGD Law Firm © All rights reserved 2021

Facebook-f Twitter Linkedin-in