When people hear about large-scale lawsuits involving dangerous products, the term “class action” often comes to mind. But for cases like the Roundup cancer litigation or the emerging lawsuits over the BioZorb breast implant, a different type of legal action is at play: the mass tort.
If a defective product has injured you and you are wondering what your legal options look like, understanding the difference between a mass tort and a class action is a crucial first step. Here’s what you need to know—and why it matters.
Mass Tort vs. Class Action: What’s the Difference?
Both mass torts and class actions involve large numbers of people harmed by the same product; however, the legal structure and outcome for each plaintiff differ significantly.
- Class Action: A single lawsuit represents an entire group (the class), and the outcome is the same for everyone involved. Individuals don’t have much say in how the case is handled.
- Mass Tort: Each person files an individual claim. The cases are grouped together for efficiency (usually in a federal MDL—multi-district litigation), but each plaintiff’s injuries, circumstances, and compensation are considered individually.
In short, mass torts treat you like a person. Class actions treat you like a number.
Real-World Example: Roundup
Roundup, a common weed killer, became the subject of nationwide litigation when thousands of people diagnosed with non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma alleged that the product’s active ingredient, glyphosate, caused their cancer. More importantly, they claimed Monsanto (now owned by Bayer) failed to warn consumers of the risk.
Rather than a single class action, these claims became a mass tort. Why? Because: - Each plaintiff had a unique cancer diagnosis - Exposure levels and usage varied - Medical treatment and damages were different
Treating these cases individually was the only fair course of action. And it led to several major verdicts and settlements.
Please note that the Roundup litigation has been largely resolved, and HGD is no longer accepting new Roundup cases.
Emerging Case Spotlight: BioZorb
BioZorb is a surgical implant used after breast cancer surgery to guide radiation and support healing. But for many women, it has led to serious complications—including chronic pain, scarring, and the need for surgical removal.
These lawsuits are still in their early stages, but they are being organized under a mass tort model. Why? Because:
- Injuries vary: some patients suffer long-term pain, others physical disfigurement
- Each person’s surgery, device response, and outcome is unique
The legal system recognizes that this isn’t a one-size-fits-all situation. Mass torts enable the honoring of the individual experiences of every patient.
HGD is currently accepting inquiries related to BioZorb cases. If you’ve experienced complications, we want to hear your story.
Why Mass Torts Matter
Mass torts give power back to people. They allow individuals to:
- Pursue justice on their own terms
- Receive compensation based on their actual experience
- Join a collective legal effort while still maintaining personal representation
At HGD, we focus our energy on clients who deserve to be seen, heard, and treated with dignity throughout the legal process.
How Do I Know If I Have a Mass Tort Case?
If a defective product has harmed you—whether it’s a recalled medical device, a contaminated drug, or an everyday chemical—you may have a valid claim. Key factors include:
- Proof of product use or exposure
- Documented injury or health complications
- A connection between the two supported by medical evidence
The best way to find out? Talk to a team that’s handled hundreds of these cases.
Let’s Talk About What Happened to You
Every case starts with a conversation. At HGD, we’ll listen carefully, explain your options clearly, and walk beside you through every step of the legal journey.
If you believe a product harmed you, don’t wait. Time limits apply, and the sooner we can begin gathering evidence, the better.
Contact HGD for a free, confidential consultation.
